Legal Opinion

Pong Ying v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 26, 1933No. 5041PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below Pong Ying was found guilty on an indictment charging him with receiving 240 grains of smoking opium fraudulently imported into the United States. The evidence clearly sustained this charge and warranted the verdict of guilty rendered and the sentence imposed. At the trial defendant’s counsel moved to suppress the evidence on the ground that the testifying narcotic agents had violated Ms constitutional rights by forcing an entrance into Ms apartment and there discovering the contraband opium. On the refusal of the court to suppress the evidence this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Brock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cheng Wai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Rocchia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States v. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. Sam ChinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API