McMacken v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
In this appeal, appellant seeks to have us hold SDCL 15-2-9 unconstitutional.1 The South Dakota Code designates SDCL 15-2-9 as a “Limitation of action for deficiencies in construction of building.” Essentially, the statute; (1) precludes any legal action for injuries proximately caused by deficiency in design, planning or construction of an improvement to real property brought against the designer, planner or constructor more than six years after substantial completion of such construction, (2) makes this defense unavailable to the owner or person in actual possession, and,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Daugaard v. Baltic Cooperative Building Supply Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.