Legal Opinion
Hauck v. Lillick
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 24, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Creal, Commissioner
Reversing.
Paul G. Hauck and May L. Hauck, Ms wife, are appealing from a judgment dismissing their petition against Albert Lillick and Edith Lillick, husband and wife, in which they sought to recover on a note for $2,050 and for the specific performance of a contract under'which appellees agreed to purchase a lot from them. It is alleged in the petition that under the contract as evidenced by writing filed with the petition, they agreed to sell and appellees agreed to purchase lot No. 44, fronting 75 feet on Arcadia avenue in Port Mitchell, Ky., at the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Swift v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Griffith v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Litteral v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herfurth v. HorineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Tennessee Gas & Transmission Co. v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Hauck v. LillickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936