Legal Opinion

McKown v. Board of Supervisors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1987No. Appeal, No. 2512 C. D. 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this zoning case, a landowner challenged the East Fallowfield Township Zoning Ordinance as exclusionary, alleging that it failed to provide for the townships fair share of mobilehome park development. The townships board of supervisors rejected the landowners challenge and curative amendment,1 concluding that the existing zoning ordinance, which provided for mobilehome park development, as such, in two-tenths of one percent (.2%) of the townships area, was not exclusionary because mobilehome park development could also be accomplished in the R-3 high density…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Fernley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Schuylkill Tp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Township of Willistown v. Chesterdale Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Environmental Communities of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. North Coventry TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Cracas v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McClimans v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Swedeland Road Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Newtown Land Ltd. Partnership v. Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API