Legal Opinion
Cracas v. Board of Supervisors
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 1985No. Appeal, No. 3007 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
In this zoning case, a group of landowners1 challenged the West Pikeland Township zoning ordinance as exclusionary, alleging that it failed to provide for a variety of commercial uses. The township’s board of supervisors rejected the landowners’ -challenge and proposed curative amendment, concluding that the existing zoning ordinance permitted the commercial uses in question. On appeal, the court of common pleas affirmed on the same grounds, without taking additional evidence. Consistent with our scope of review,2 we *426must determine whether the board of supervisors erred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Casey v. ZONING HEAR. BD. OF WARWICK TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Caln Nether Co., L.P. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Atiyeh v. BD. OF COM'RS OF TP. OF BETHLEHEMCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Borough of Edgewood v. Lamanti's PizzeriaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In re Appeal of Marple Gardens, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Thomason v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF RADNORCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.