Legal Opinion

West v. Wegeforth

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 3, 1926No. 11,574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Action on contract by Dr. Wegeforth, of California, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against West. Plaintiff recovered judgment; defendant alleges error and asks for a supersedeas. We refer to them hereafter as in the trial court.

Dr. Wegeforth. rendered professional services to members of defendant’s family, for which defendant agreed to pay. Later, however, defendant disputed the value of the services, the necessity for the performance of certain surgical operations, and the skill and good faith of the physician. ■ Correspondence ensued, principally between Dr. Wegeforth and defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Avon Center Holdings, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Caldwell v. ArmstrongColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Rogers v. FunkhouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. School District No. 1 v. FakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API