Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. Goodwin
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action on contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Samuel W. Johnson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This is an action brought by Alice L. Goodwin against The Holy Cross Gold Mining & Milling Company, to re*533cover upon an alleged contract, by the terms of which the company acknowledged itself indebted to her in the sum of $11,000, and agreed to pay the same. The trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff and defendant brings the cause here for review.
It is contended by plaintiff in error, defendant below, that it was error to direct a verdict for plaintiff, that there was evidence to go to the jury on several issues raised by the answer and cross-complaint.
The contract sued on is one in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Longmont Supply Ditch Co. v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Buckley v. JenningsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Littleton v. Employers Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Forbes v. GoldenhershColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Dickson v. RetallicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- West v. WegeforthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- White v. Thatcher Financial Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.