Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Wipson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1980No. Civ. 58271PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, Acting P. J.

Appellant Chanel LeMonz appeals from a denial of a motion to set aside an interlocutory judgment of divorce.

The pertinent facts are: Appellant and respondent had been married for 22 years before respondent filed his petition for dissolution on March 6, 1972. Respondent took a default against appellant on May 8, 1973, and had entered on May 23, 1973, an interlocutory judgment dividing the community property and providing no spousal support.

Appellant suffered a mental breakdown shortly after the filing for dissolution and was hospitalized for two months. After…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. v. ChuidianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. In Re the Marriage of UmphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Aheroni v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Gribin Von Dyl & Associates, Inc. v. KovalskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Huddleson v. HuddlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API