Legal Opinion
United Nations Relief & Rehabilitation Administration v. the Mormacmail
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 7, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Three libels have been filed by United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) to recover for alleged damage to cargoes shipped via three of' respondent’s vessels from ports in the United States to Gdynia, Poland. Appearing specially, respondent has excepted to each of the libels on the ground that' they were not brought within the period limited by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act and on the further ground that libellant has failed to prosecute its claims with due diligence.
In two of these suits (A. 153-204 and A. 153-205), the libels were filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Redman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Marshall v. International Mercantile Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Ore Steamship Corporation v. D/SA/S HasselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Anchor Line (Henderson Bros.), Ltd. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- James Battaglia, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- GOLDLAWR, INCORPORATED v. ShubertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Empacadora Puertorriqueña De Carnes, Inc. v. Alterman Transport Line, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1969
- Howmet Corporation v. Tokyo Shipping Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.