Legal Opinion
Anchor Line (Henderson Bros.), Ltd. v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 9, 1925No. 58PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■HAND, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
In The Persiana, 185 F. 396, 107 C. C. A. 416, we held that a notation of damage upon the ship’s receipt signed by the consignee was not enough to satisfy a clause which read that the ship should not be liable “for any damages to any goods, notice of which is not given before the removal of the goods.” That was a far stronger case for the consignee than that at bar, because the bill of lading did not require, as here, that a claim should be made, but only notice of the damages themselves. The San Guglielmo, 249 F. 588, 161 C. C. A. 514,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The PersianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- The WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
- Pierce v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- The St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
- The San GuglielmoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- American National Fire Insurance Company v. Yellow Freight Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- E. Gerli & Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. Munson S. S. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Baron v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- WR Grace & Co. v. Panama R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.