Legal Opinion

Filice v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2008No. 49A02-0707-CR-591PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

Rohypnol, a notorious date rape drug, causes temporary amnesia by inducing extreme feelings of intoxication in a user. 1 The facts of this case require us to address, for the first time, various legal issues surrounding a defendant’s sexual contact with a woman who was in a Rohypnol-induced state of unawareness. While there is evidence in the record that the defendant knew or should have known that the woman was impaired, there is no evidence that he administered Rohypnol to her or knew that she was under the influence of that drug.

Appellant-defendant Herman Filice…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Caraway v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Bret Lee Sisson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Sharkey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Townsend v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Walter E. Smith, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API