Legal Opinion

State v. Deitz

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1991No. 18443PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*756SILAK, Judge.

Bruce Deitz entered a conditional plea of guilty to a misdemeanor charge of driving while under the influence, I.C. § 18-8004. On appeal, Deitz contends that the magistrate erroneously considered a withheld judgment of conviction entered in a previously dismissed action in determining that the instant violation was Deitz's second within five years under former I.C. § 18-8005(2).1 For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of conviction entered by the magistrate.

The facts in this case are not disputed. In October of 1986, Deitz pled guilty to driving under the influence.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ex Parte MedleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Magnuson v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. BeverIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In re FranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. SchumacherIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. ParkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PerkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. Samuel Thomas GlennIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API