Legal Opinion
State v. Perkins
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 2000No. 25323PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This appeal requires that we determine the applicability of Idaho’s sex offender registration statutes and an associated administrative rule where a defendant has been adjudicated guilty of a sex offense but the district court has withheld judgment and has ultimately dismissed the charge following a successful period of probation.
BACKGROUND
In 1992, James Perkins was charged with statutory rape, Idaho Code § 18-6101, based upon allegations that at age nineteen he had sexual intercourse with a thirteen-year-old girl. Perkins ultimately pleaded guilty. The district court entered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Peltier v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WattsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- K Mart Corp. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ParkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Schroeder v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. ReedIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. KnappIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.