Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Green

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 12, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of narcotic drugs *49(G. L. c. 90, § 24 [1988 ed.]). The evidence warranted a finding that, before his arrest, the defendant had consumed codeine for which he had a prescription. Chapter 90, § 24 (l)(a)(l), of the General Laws makes it an offense to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of “narcotic drugs . . . as defined in [G. L. c. 94C, § l].”1 There was no direct evidence that codeine is a narcotic drug as defined in G. L. c. 94C, § 1.

The defendant moved for a required finding of not guilty. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarroneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. WhynaughtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrinkleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. GonzalesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Johnson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. GrecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API