Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grinkley

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 16, 1997No. 96-P-1131PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.

Responding to a telephone report about black youths with a gun in a public playground, investigating Framingham police officers stopped and pat-frisked the defendant, Lawrence J. Grinkley. The frisk produced no gun but did find two prescription bottles in Grinkley’s pants pocket that contained twenty-eight bags of crack cocaine. A jury convicted Grinkley of possession of a class B substance with intent to distribute (G. L. c. 94C, § 32A[o]) and related offenses. He argues on appeal that a judge erroneously denied his motion to *63suppress the seized cocaine because the Commonwealth failed to…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CostaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. CavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. DooceyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. MorseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. LoveMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API