Legal Opinion

Keehn v. Laubach

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 13, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Plaintiff, as successor receiver of Central Mutual Insurance Company of Chicago, Illinois, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Clarence K. Daubach.

Plaintiff in his stated capacity sued Clarence K. Laubacli and William Buchecker, individually and trading as Laubach Transportation Co., to recover an insolvency assessment of $385.90 levied against them .as members and holders of an insurance policy issued to them by the Central Mutual Insurance Company. There was no service as to Buchecker. The case was tried as to Laubadi by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Osborn v. OzlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. FernandezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. City of Newark v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re HoffmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. VW Credit, Inc. v. Coast Automotive Group, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API