Loeb v. Friedman's Express, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether an interstate motor carrier has effectively limited its liability for loss of merchandise transported by it, The merchandise, shipped in interstate commerce, was stolen from the carrier, the defendant Friedman’s Express, Inc. The plaintiffs, consignees, sued for the sum of $1,980, the full value of the stolen merchandise. Coneededly the defendant insurance company is liable equally with the carrier. The defendants resisted the claim on the ground that the carrier had duly limited its liability, as it was permitted to do by statute. The court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Caten v. Salt City Movers & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Lindenburg v. American Railway Express Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pettis ex rel. United States v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Gordon H. Mooney, Ltd. v. Farrell Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Johnson v. BEKINS MOVING & STORAGE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Paramount Dress Co. v. Kirby & Kirby, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Semi Metals, Inc. v. Pinter BrothersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.