Legal Opinion

City of Ozark v. Byrd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1932No. 4 Div. 659PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtI-Cnigiit, J.

The city of Ozark, under the municipal public improvement statutes authorizing municipalities of this state to improve its streets and to levy the cost thereof against the abutting property owners made certain improvements upon Eufaula street of said city. The appellee’s property abutted upon that street. After making the improvements, which consisted of the contraction of “storni drains, concrete sidewalks, concrete curbs and gutters and brick street paying on concrete base,” the appellant undertook to levy the' cost of the same, within constitutional limitations, upon the abutting property.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Lipes v. HandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. City of Chicago v. NodeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Town of Eutaw v. BotnickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edmondson v. BlakeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Alaga Coach Line, Inc. v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Alaga Coach Line, Inc. v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API