Town of Eutaw v. Botnick
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. S. H. Spkott. Action by H. Botnick against the toAvn of EutaAV. Prom a judgmentNor plaintiff, defendant appeals. The defendant had a right to show that the plaintiff had offered to sell his property for a less sum than he testified that it was worth! — 6 Am. & Eng. Enc. Laiv, (1st Ed:) 620; ÉrtMdywine '& 1$. Rif: Co', v. Rancié, 78 Pá. 454 '^Springer y.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. S. H. Spkott. Action by H. Botnick against the toAvn of EutaAV. Prom a judgmentNor plaintiff, defendant appeals. The defendant had a right to show that the plaintiff had offered to sell his property for a less sum than he testified that it was worth! — 6 Am. & Eng. Enc. Laiv, (1st Ed:) 620; ÉrtMdywine '& 1$. Rif: Co', v. Rancié, 78 Pá. 454 '^Springer y. City of Chicago, 12 L. R. A. 609. The defendant had a' right to sIíoav the market value of the plaintiff’s said lot, immediately after tlie grading was done. — City Council v. Townsend, 80…
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, J,
This Avas an action by the appellee against appellant, claiming dámages for injury to tlie property of the plaintiff caused by the grading — excavating — of the sideAvalk. abutting said property. The complaint as amended alleged “that the said property was greatly impaired and injured and the market price of said property was depreciated” by the Avork done; and issue was joined on the first plea of not guilty, and the third plea, alleging that the work complained of “has not lessened or impaired the market Amine of the property.” The only assignments insisted on relate to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Newman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. Keystone Lime Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Dean v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Meighan v. Birmingham Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- City of Huntsville v. PulleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.