State v. Gray
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
In this case, the defendant moved to suppress evidence on the ground that officers did not have reasonable suspicion to seize him. The only evidence was the uncontradicted testimony of the officers. The trial court granted the motion to suppress. The State appealed. The Twelfth Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the trial court. 1 We granted review to consider whether the appellate court gave proper deference to the trial court’s findings of fact.
In a similar case, State v. Ross, 2 we have held that the trial court’s decision should have been affirmed because of the deference due its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Lerma v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Trejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Turner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.