Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Reliable Dayton Motor Car Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1911No. 16,861PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Mitchell district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a written contract on the 28th day of May, 1907, by which the defendant agreed to give the plaintiff the exclusive agency for the sale of its automobiles in the counties of Osborne, Mitchell, Cloud, Clay, Washington, Republic, Jewell, Smith, Phillips and Rooks, in the state of Kansas, and further agreed not to sell its machines within that territory except to the plaintiff, in consideration of which the plaintiff agreed to push the sales within the territory mentioned to the best of his ability.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schiffman v. Peerless Motor Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. North American Pump Corp. v. Clay Equipment Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Calkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Robertson's v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. National Micrographics Systems, Inc. v. Oce-Industries, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API