Legal Opinion
Klopp v. Overlade
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 28, 1946No. 1116PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Petitioner, having been classified by his local board in Qass IV — E as a conscientious objector to military service and having been physically examined, was ordered to report to his local board for induction into work of national importance. Failing to comply, he was indicted and convicted for failure to report and the conviction affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Klopp v. United States, 148 F.2d 659. No application for certiorari was filed and he was, thereupon, in execution of the judgment, incarcerated in the United States…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Riddle v. DycheSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sargeant v. the State Bank of IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Klopp v. OverladeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946