Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kunz v. Campbell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition by the State of South Dakota, on relation of M. Kunz, for a writ of certiorari to review the action of A. W. Campbell, judge of the fifth judicial circuit of South Dakota, in confirming an execution sale to Lucetta R. Miller on foreclosure of a mortgage. The fact's are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

Prom the return made to the writ of certiorari in the above-entitled action it appears: That on October 2, 1891, a judgment of foreclosure was made and entered in the circuit court of Beadle county, in an action wherein M. Kunz, the plaintiff Hferein was plaintiff, and Ann Eliza Miller, Medad Miller, Lewis W. Hazen, and John A. Fowler were defendants. That on November 10, 1891, a sale of the mortgaged premises, consisting of several separate tracts of land, was made, under which one Lucetta R. Miller bid in the N. E. í of section 19, township No. 110, range 65, in Beadle county, for the sum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rowley v. Van BenthuysenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Cazet v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Hale v. . ClausonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. May v. MayNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  5. Butler v. Hempstead's AdministratorsNew York Supreme Court · 1837

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mellen v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. First National Bank v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kirby v. Circuit CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hollister v. BuchananSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  5. South Dakota Housing v. MeinhardtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API