Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Circuit Court

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original application for certiorari to the circuit court of McCook county. The facts are stated in the opinion. A sale made in this state under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage is a quasi judicial sale, and no confirmation thereof is necessary, except in compliance with Sec. 5149, Comp. Laws, and Rule 29 of the circuit court. Rorer Jud. Sales, 2nd Ed.. § 591; 12 Am. & Eng. Encyc.

Read the full summary

Original application for certiorari to the circuit court of McCook county. The facts are stated in the opinion. A sale made in this state under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage is a quasi judicial sale, and no confirmation thereof is necessary, except in compliance with Sec. 5149, Comp. Laws, and Rule 29 of the circuit court. Rorer Jud. Sales, 2nd Ed.. § 591; 12 Am. & Eng. Encyc. Law, 208. The court having made an order confirming the sale, had no power or authority to vacate the same under the showing presented. Rorer Jud. Sales, § 25; Koehler v. Ball, 2 Kan. 160; Comp. Laws, Subd. 2, §…

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

On June 3, 1895, a sale of certain real property was made by the sheriff of McCook county under a judgment entered in foreclosure proceedings, in which Joe Kirby was plaintiff and W. H. Ramsey and others were defendants, for the sum of $657. At this sale Joe Kirby bid in the property for $100, andón June 17th the sale was confirthed, and a deficiency judgment against the defendants in said action for $585.25 was entered. On June 24th the circuit court, upon application of said Ramsey and others, made an order vacating and setting aside said sale, and ordering a resale of the mortgaged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cazet v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Hale v. . ClausonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Bonds v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. May v. MayNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  5. Kirby v. RamseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cole v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF HURONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cole v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF HURONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cole v. Bd. of Adjustment of the City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lamar Outdoor Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Smith v. ReidSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API