Legal Opinion
Mission National Insurance v. Schulman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 6, 1986No. Civ. No. B 84-811 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DALY, Chief Judge.
After review and absent objection, the Magistrate’s recommended ruling is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and RATIFIED.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate.
This action sounding in tort and contract relates to a property insurance policy issued by the plaintiff to the defendants Schulman and Schulman Investment Company (“Schulman”) for a building leased by Schulman to the defendant United Organics Corporation (“UOC”). Pending before the court is Schulman’s motion for summary judgment, Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set out below, that motion should be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Andrew L. Cunninghame v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Brastex Corporation v. Allen International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey, a Corporation v. Foxbilt, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance v. VerziCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996