Legal Opinion

Bachur v. Democratic National Party

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1987No. Nos. 87-3872(L), 87-3875 and 87-3876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:

In a suit by Nicholas R. Bachur, Sr., a registered Democrat, the district court ruled that Rule 6C of the Delegate Selection Rules for the 1984 Democratic National Convention as implemented in Maryland infringed Bachur’s fundamental right to vote in an election for delegates to the national convention to select the Party’s candidates for President and Vice-President. As implemented, Rule 6C required Bachur to allocate his votes on the basis of the sex of the candidates for delegate. He was permitted to vote for not more than four female and four male delegates.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heitmanis v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Ricard v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Heitmanis v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Heitmanis v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  5. Torres v. New York State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API