Legal Opinion
Heitmanis v. Austin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1990No. 88-1214PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
899 F.2d 521
George HEITMANIS, Keith Murphy, Mary Malinowski, John
Pafford and Richard Bobosky, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Michigan Republican State Central Committee, Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
Richard AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of
State of Michigan, and Christopher Thomas, in his
official capacity as Director of
Elections of the State of
Michigan, Defendants-Appellees,
Senator Vernon J. Ehlers, et al., Intervening Defendants.
No. 88-1214.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 10, 1989.
Decided March 29, 1990.
James F. Schoener (argued), Sarasota, Fla., and James M.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bruce Baskin v. Bath Township Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Bay County Democratic Party v. LandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Michael SalibaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Hicks v. Clermont Cty. Republican Cent. Commt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Inrecon, LLC v. Highlands InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.