Legal Opinion
Zander v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 20, 2005No. A04-2393PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellants filed claims in district court under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA), Minn.Stat. §§ 116B.01-116B.13 (2004), alleging violations resulting from a state highway expansion project. The district court dismissed appellants’ claims by granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Because appellant has not presented genuine issues of material fact sufficient to support a prima facie case under MERA, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Dan Zander and John Zan-der own property in Waseca County, a portion of which lies within the planned construction area for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blocker v. PatchUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Blocker v. PatchUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Bryan Blocker v. Denise Irene PatchUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Comcast Cable Communication Mgmt v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005