Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Martin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 2005No. A05-1650Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Richard H. Martin has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, continuing to practice law after being placed on restricted status for failure to comply with mandatory continuing legal education requirements and failing to adequately cooperate with the resulting disciplinary investigation, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 5.5 and 8.1(a)(3).

Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API