Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 24, 1943No. C. D. 751PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This controversy arising at Duluth, Minn., involves the classification of an importation of wild rice from Canada. The product was classified as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the commodity is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1722 as “vegetable substances, crude or unmanufactured, not specially provided for,” or, if dutiable, it is dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article, or at 1 % cents per pound under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. George Beurhaus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Mackay v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Protest 21337-K of DavisUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Protest 63831-K of DavisUnited States Customs Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API