Fraser v. Fraser
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1ConcurrenceCotjnihan, J.
I regret that I am unable to concur in the opinion of the court in this case.
The issue to be determined depends upon the construction of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 207, § 6 and § 10, both of which are set out in footnotes to the opinion.
I am in accord with the facts as set forth in the opinion but I differ in the inference which the court draws from such facts. I think it should be emphasized that, although Fraser told Mary Jane that they could not be married in Massachusetts, he also told her that it was all right to be married in New Hampshire. In her testimony Mary Jane insisted several times…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hopkins v. HopkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Royal v. RoyalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Green v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Ewald v. EwaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.