Legal Opinion

Royal v. Royal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 23, 1949PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummtjs, J.

About September 1, 1939, shortly after a divorce obtained in Massachusetts by Anna E. Royal against Harold 0. Royal had become absolute on July 28, 1939 (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 208, § 21), and during the period of two years after the decree became absolute during which Harold 0. Royal was prohibited from marrying again by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 208, § 24, Harold O. Royal and Edna E. Smith, both residents of Massachusetts, went to Stafford County, Virginia, for the purpose of marrying each other, were married there on September 2, 1939, and immediately returned to Massachusetts, intending to live…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Coe v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. School Committee of Springfield v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Olsson v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Welker v. WelkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Daniels v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Chittick v. ChittickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API