Legal Opinion

Buck v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2000No. ED 75218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES R. DOWD, Judge.

On September 25, 1998, after an eviden-tiary hearing, the motion court denied Gary Glenn Buck’s (hereinafter “Buck”) Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Buck appeals.

Facts

Two separate trials resulting in four convictions form the factual predicate for this Rule 29.15 motion. The evidence in a light most favorable to the State on these underlying convictions is as follows: On August 11, 1995, Buck broke into the Survivor’s Nightclub and stole money from the cash register. On September 13, 1996, he was convicted after a jury trial of one count of burglary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Lee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. DormireMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Glaviano v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Duley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Frazier v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Henry Frazier v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API