Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2014No. ED 99517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Introduction

Patricia L. Cohen, Judge.

Henry Frazier (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his claims that: (1) trial counsel and appellate counsel were ineffective because they failed to withdraw due to a conflict of interest; (2) the prosecutor committed a Brady1 violation; and (3) trial counsel failed to investigate and impeach the victim. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On the night of September 23,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steele v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Nunley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. LARRY G. MCCONNELL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Mitchell v. JenningsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API