Frazier v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Introduction
Patricia L. Cohen, Judge.
Henry Frazier (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his claims that: (1) trial counsel and appellate counsel were ineffective because they failed to withdraw due to a conflict of interest; (2) the prosecutor committed a Brady1 violation; and (3) trial counsel failed to investigate and impeach the victim. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
On the night of September 23,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steele v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Nunley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- LARRY G. MCCONNELL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Mitchell v. JenningsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023