Legal Opinion
United States v. American Bag & Paper Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 21, 1979No. 79-1836PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
We are asked in this appeal to reverse the Unites States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and allow American Bag & Paper Corp. (“American Bag”) to withdraw its plea of nolo contendere to a charge of violating section 1 of the Sherman Act. The appeal is predicated upon the contention that the district court, in imposing interest in addition to the fine agreed upon as part of a plea bargain, rejected the terms of the plea bargain and, that thus, under the terms of the agreement itself and Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(4), American Bag is entitled to withdraw its…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Samuel SavageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Rudolph Valentino HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Antonioli v. CoalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. John MoscahlaidisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Interdynamics, Inc., and Smiths Industries, Limited v. Firma Wolf, Arend Wolf, and Trans Tech, Inc. Appeal of Trans Tech, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. David S. Hayes, David S. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.