Legal Opinion
Interest of Voisine
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2016No. 20160061PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VandeWalle, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Raymond Voisine appealed a district court order finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual and denying his petition for discharge from the- North Dakota State Hospital. We affirm.
*784I.
[¶2] Stemming from his conviction of gross sexual imposition in 2008, the State petitioned to commit Voisine to the state hospital as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3.
[¶3] Voisine’s actions, leading to his civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual, have resulted in six previous appeals to this Court. See Voisine v. State, 2008 ND 91, 748…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Alumni Ass'n of University v. Hart Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byers v. Voisine (In Re Voisine)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Interest of VoisineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Interest of VoisineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019