Legal Opinion
Thorburn v. Roper
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 25, 1999No. 4:98CV3286PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
URBOM, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Monsignor Timothy Thor-burn, Pam Tabor, Dominic Pynes, and Mary Adam, are individuals who have engaged in protests and demonstrations against abortion. The plaintiffs have brought this action against the defendants, the Lincoln City Attorney and the Chief of the Lincoln Police Department, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from the application of Lincoln Municipal Code § 9.40.090, which is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Klein v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Klein v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Phelps-Roper v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014
- Timothy Thorburn v. William AustinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Timothy Thorburn v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000