Legal Opinion
Klein v. San Diego County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2006No. 04-55819PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of a residential picketing ordinance enacted by the Defendant San Diego County (“the County”). Because we conclude that the ordinance is not unconstitutional in every conceivable application and is not unconstitutionally vague, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims.
I. Factual Background
In 2002, the County passed an ordinance to regulate the conduct of people wanting to picket in residential neighborhoods. The ordinance reads: “No person shall engage in picketing activity that is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- GET OUTDOORS II, LLC v. City of San Diego, Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Klein v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Get Outdoors II, LLC v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007