State v. Spidle
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
In his appeal of the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of statutory rape in the first degree, Lawrence Dale Spidle complains about the prosecutor’s questions and comments during voir dire. 1 Spidle asserts that the circuit court erred in allowing the prosecutor to question the venire panel regarding what type of evidence they would require to convict, to comment on Spidle’s right to testify, and to define “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” We affirm the circuit court’s judgment.
Spidle did not object to any of the state’s comments during voir dire, so he did not preserve…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State v. BuchliMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. DunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.