Sports Car Centre of Syracuse, Ltd. v. Bombard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and new trial granted against defendant Bombard Car Company, Inc. Memorandum: At the outset, we note that plaintiff appealed from an order and not from the subsequent judgment. We deem the appeal to have been taken from the judgment (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988).
Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Bombard Car Company, Inc. (defendant), for a directed verdict on the ground that defendant was not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the acts of its employee. Viewed in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lundberg v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Hatton v. Quad Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Rocks & Jeans, Inc. v. Lakeview Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holmes v. Gary Goldberg & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Anglo-Iberia Underwriting Management Co. v. LodderhoseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Regency Oaks Corp. v. Norman-Spencer McKernan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Adames v. VelasquezNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- Lesa M. Primeaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.