Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lesa M. Primeaux v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1999No. 97-2691Published

1DissentLay, Circuit Judge

with whom WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, join.

The court’s opinion is directly contrary to the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Williams v. United States, 350 U.S. 857, 76 S.Ct. 100, 100 L.Ed. 761 (1955). In addition, the court now sets a new precedent not only in this circuit, but throughout the United States, in departing from uniform interpretation of federal law.1 The court now finds that regardless of state law as to vicarious liability, Congress has limited liability under the FTCA to a wooden interpretation of “scope of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. John L. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Sharon Karibian v. Columbia University, John Borden, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees v. Mark Urban, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API