Legal Opinion
Burke v. Crosson
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosemary S. Pooler, J.
The plaintiffs, who are County Court Judges serving in Onondaga County, seek summary judgment on their claim that the Equal Protection Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions require that they be paid the same salary as County Court Judges serving in 13 other counties of the State. Two of these counties (Erie and Monroe) are in the Fourth Judicial Department; four (Albany, Clinton, Sullivan and Tompkins) are in the Third Judicial Department; and the remaining seven (Dutchess, Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Rock-land, Suffolk and Westchester) are in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maresca v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- D'Amico v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996