Legal Opinion
Magun v. Bombaci
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 25, 1985No. File 209307PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The plaintiffs purchased the subject real estate, with dwelling house and improvements located thereon, by general warranty deed from the defendants on August 4, 1978. Among other provisions, the deed provided “. . . with the buildings and all other improvements thereon. ...” (Emphasis added.) The premises were conveyed free and clear of all encumbrances, except as mentioned in the deed. The deed contained no reference to the location of the driveway and/or sewer lines, or any other improvement.
From the evidence, it is established that part of the driveway and portions of the sewer lateral…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aczas v. Stuart Heights, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Whittelsey v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Staite v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Fehlhaber v. FehlhaberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991