Legal Opinion

Fehlhaber v. Fehlhaber

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

. Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of the Bronx, first district, rendered in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiff and defendant were each the owners of one-half of the certain parcel of real estate known as lots Nos. 97 and 98 on the map of Seneca park on Tieman avenue, in the borough of the Bronx. The defendant, by a full covenant and warranty deed, conveyed to the plaintiff bis one-half interest in the property in question, and warranted that *150said interest was “ free from all incumbrances.” The evidence shows that a building on the property conveyed encroached on the adjacent property on the north one and forty-nine hundredths feet and on the south one and forty-one hundredths feet, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGuckin v. . MilbankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Stearn v. HesdorferNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. AyresOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kennell v. TandyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Magun v. BombaciConnecticut Superior Court · 1985
  4. Gamorsil Realty Corp. v. GraefNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API