Legal Opinion
Schietinger v. Tauscher Cronacher Professional Engineers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 2007PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*955In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for gross negligence, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), dated January 24, 2006, which granted the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment limiting its liability to the sum of $1,705.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs, Elena Schietinger and George Schietinger, hired the defendant, an engineering company, to conduct a prepurchase inspection of their home and prepare a report. Under the terms of the agreement, if the defendant was found liable for any loss or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Peluso v. Tauscher Cronacher Professional Engineers, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rector v. Calamus Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mancuso v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Smith-Hoy v. AMC Property Evaluations, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ryan v. IM Kapco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Corbett v. FIRSTLINE SECURITY, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Finch v. Inspectech, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.