Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 20, 1911No. 3813PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Accusation of violation of game law; from city court of Blakely —Judge Bambo.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

An accusation in the city court of Blakely charged Ernest Hammond with a violation of the act to prohibit the killing of certain game in Early county, approved August 17, 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 417). On arraignment the accused made a written motion to quash the accusation, on the ground that it charged no offense against the laws of this State: (1) because the above-mentioned local law is in conflict with article-1, section 4, paragraph 1, of the constitution of Georgia (Code of 1910, § 6391,), which prohibits the enactment of a local or special law in any case for which provision has been made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Village of Ridgway v. County of GallatinIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Papworth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Davis v. Dougherty CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. State v. Southern Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Dekalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Stephens v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. McNair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API