Legal Opinion

Hassett v. Buchfinck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1937No. 29893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is a proceeding upon a motion to cancel a sheriff’s deed and set aside the decree of foreclosure, sale, and confirmation, for the reason that service by publication was made upon the owner of the equity of redemption when he was a resident at the time of Ord, Nebraska. From a de*316cree denying such motion, an appeal was taken to this court.

In December, 1932, a petition for the foreclosure of a mortgage of $4,000 was filed by the plaintiff, George W. Hassett. Among the defendants named therein were Fred A. Buchfinck and his wife, Freda K. Buchfinck, and paragraph eight of the petition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. County of HitchcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hayes County v. WilemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kaufmann v. DrexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. German National Bank of Lincoln v. KautterNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. VonSeggern v. WillmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. County of Douglas v. FeenanNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Stanton v. StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Marshall v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ehlers v. GroveNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API