Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2013-1502PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Barbara Nichols brings this action against her former employer, the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VH”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 633a et seq. (“ADEA”). The Court previously dismissed Nichols’s complaint for failure to state a claim, but simultaneously granted Nichols leave to file an amended complaint to address the deficiencies identified in the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Washington v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fragola v. the Kenific Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Jimenez v. DukeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Kleo Ag v. Rivada Networks, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Manus v. HaydenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.