In Re Application of Avcollie
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Pellegrino, Spada and Wagner, Js.
The dispositive issue before this panel, raised by an application for reinstatement to the bar, pursuant to Practice Book § 36, is whether the applicant is presently fit to exercise the privileges and functions of an attorney, as an officer of the court, and as a confidential manager of the affairs and business of others entrusted to his care. The panel answers in the negative.
In resolving this issue, the panel could reasonably and logically conclude that the reasons given by the standing committee on recommendations for admission to the Connecticut bar…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- In re PaganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of DortchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SnaiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- ISB v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.