Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Graham

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. 97-2101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After receiving notice that respondent was disbarred in Connecticut, we issued an Order to Show Cause to respondent and service was attempted on him according to our rules. Respondent could not be found. Notice was then served on the Clerk pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(B), which designates the Clerk as the agent for service for any attorney admitted in Ohio who becomes a nonresident or conceals his whereabouts. We therefore find that respondent has received notice of these proceedings and was provided an opportunity to be heard.

When an attorney is disciplined in another state, Gov.Bar R.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Application of AvcollieConnecticut Superior Court · 1993
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HineOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API